Close Menu
National Security News
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Terrorism
  • China
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
    • Space
    • Nuclear
    • Cyber
  • Investigations

Trending

World edging towards Third World War as global conflicts threaten to merge, warns former Army commander

October 14, 2026

Ethiopia and Eritrea ‘perilously close to war’ amid Red Sea tensions

October 14, 2026

MI5 devoting more resources to Russian threat than during Cold War, spy chief warns

October 13, 2026

US could join the war against the Houthis

October 12, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
National Security News
Subscribe
X (Twitter)
Login
IPSO Trusted Journalism in National Security
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Terrorism
  • China
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
    • Space
    • Nuclear
    • Cyber
  • Investigations
National Security News
  • Ukraine War
  • Russia
  • Terrorism
  • China
  • Iran
  • Africa
  • Tech
Home»Iran
Iran

Putin’s Nuclear Gift? Russia reportedly transfers submarine reactors to North Korea

Staff WriterBy Staff WriterSeptember 19, 20254 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

🌐 Translate Article

Translating...

📖 Read Along

💬 AI Assistant

🤖
Hi! I'm here to help you understand this article. Ask me anything about the content!
Kim Jong-un embraces Vladimir Putin during their summit in Pyongyang, June 2024. (Source – Kremlin handout via Wikimedia Commons).

By Isabella Egerton

South Korea’s military is investigating reports that Russia has delivered nuclear submarine reactor modules to North Korea — a transfer that, if confirmed, would represent one of the most serious acts of nuclear proliferation in recent decades.

According to South Korean officials cited by the Korea JoongAng Daily, Moscow shipped two to three nuclear propulsion modules to Pyongyang earlier this year. The modules — reportedly removed from decommissioned Russian submarines — include a reactor, turbine, and cooling system, the critical elements needed to power a nuclear submarine.

The alleged transfer coincided with North Korean state media photographs released in March showing Kim Jong-un touring a shipyard to inspect the regime’s first nuclear-powered submarine. Analysts estimated the vessel under construction could weigh around 7,000 tons and carry up to ten ballistic missiles in vertical launch tubes.

A strategic leap

If substantiated, the handover would mark a dramatic acceleration of North Korea’s naval nuclear ambitions. Nuclear propulsion would allow Pyongyang’s submarines to remain submerged for extended periods, travel far beyond regional waters, and deploy ballistic missiles with global reach. 

These capabilities would make North Korea’s nuclear forces much harder to neutralise in a first strike, while ensuring the regime retains a credible retaliatory capability in the event of nuclear war. Operating underwater, the submarines could move undetected by satellite surveillance, giving Pyongyang unprecedented freedom to position and launch weapons.

A quid pro quo

The reactors are widely viewed as payment for Pyongyang’s deepening military support to Russia in its war against Ukraine. Since October 2024, intelligence assessments suggest at least 12,000 North Korean troops have fought alongside Russian forces, with Kyiv warning that up to 30,000 more could follow. Western officials estimate that hundreds have already been killed in combat. In addition, Pyongyang has supplied artillery shells, rockets, and other munitions to Russia.

Moscow’s provision of nuclear propulsion technology — even from retired platforms — would not only breach longstanding United Nations Security Council resolutions but also run counter to the spirit of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Western governments have repeatedly warned that Russia’s reliance on North Korea for manpower and weapons risks eroding global non-proliferation norms.

Reverse engineering risks

Beyond the immediate transfer, access to working propulsion modules could enable North Korean scientists to reverse-engineer the technology, drastically reducing the time required to field a domestically developed nuclear submarine. The long-term implication is not simply one submarine but a potential programme — a fleet of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) that could fundamentally alter deterrence dynamics in Asia and beyond.

International repercussions

So far, Seoul has stopped short of publicly confirming the transfer, stating only that it has intelligence pointing to the delivery and is “verifying the facts.” The United States and its allies are expected to press the issue at the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency if further evidence emerges.

Analysts warn that such a transfer would force Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo to accelerate their anti-submarine warfare capabilities, deepen trilateral maritime cooperation, and prepare for a scenario in which North Korea can threaten cities worldwide with sea-based nuclear weapons.

The bigger picture

Kim Jong-un’s ties with Vladimir Putin have deepened over the past year, marked by reciprocal visits and pledges of strategic cooperation. Just weeks ago, Kim was hosted in Beijing by Xi Jinping, reinforcing Pyongyang’s bid to exploit its partnerships with Moscow and Beijing to strengthen its hand against the West.

For Russia, desperate for manpower and munitions in Ukraine, the transfer may be a tolerable price. For North Korea, it could represent the long-sought breakthrough: a credible second-strike nuclear capability that would place Pyongyang in a new league of strategic powers.

Follow on Google News Follow on X (Twitter)
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Staff Writer

Keep Reading

US could join the war against the Houthis

US prepares for renewed Iran strikes as Syria weighs joining Saudi campaign against Houthis

Is the World at War?

Yemen counter-offensive adds fresh risk to oil markets as Iran keeps Hormuz closed

British-Iranian man arrested over suspected RAF Fairford terror plot

Sanctions evasion is now a terrorism liability: what the MTN ruling means for every company that does business with the IRGC

Editor's Picks

Ethiopia and Eritrea ‘perilously close to war’ amid Red Sea tensions

October 14, 2026

MI5 devoting more resources to Russian threat than during Cold War, spy chief warns

October 13, 2026

US could join the war against the Houthis

October 12, 2026

NATO presses ahead with nuclear exercise despite Russia’s warning

October 9, 2026

Trending

US could join the war against the Houthis

Iran October 12, 2026

NATO presses ahead with nuclear exercise despite Russia’s warning

NATO October 9, 2026

US prepares for renewed Iran strikes as Syria weighs joining Saudi campaign against Houthis

United States October 8, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram LinkedIn
© 2026 National Security News. All Rights Reserved.
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
Home Topics Podcast NSN Lists

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?